STABILITY EVALUATION OF BREAD WHEAT GENOTYPES UNDER VARYING ENVIRONMENTS BY AMMI MODEL

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-7884-5463en_US
dc.authorscopusid57024050900en_US
dc.authorwosidAAP-4767-2021en_US
dc.contributor.authorKızılgeçi, Ferhat
dc.contributor.authorAlbayrak, Önder
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAkıncı, Cuma
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-20T11:08:38Z
dc.date.available2024-02-20T11:08:38Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.departmentMAÜ, Meslek Yüksekokulları, Kızıltepe Meslek Yüksekokulu, Tohumculuk Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractStable and high yield varieties identification under various conditions prior to release as a varie ty is the main steps for breeding program. In order to exploit narrow and broad adaptability of geno types and assess their effects, environment and GE interaction, 12 spring bread wheat genotypes were grown at four various experimental locations during 2013-14 and 2014-15 growing seasons. The stabil ity and superiority of genotypes were identified by the AMMI (additive main effect and multiplicative interaction) and GGE (genotype, genotype x envi ronment) biplot analysis. The AMMI analysis showed that the variance of genotype, environment and GE interaction were significant and the major treatment sum of squares were significantly affect ed by environments (85.47%), genotypes (8.51%) and GE interaction (6.07%). On the other hand, the first principal component axes (PCA 1) distributed to the complete interaction as 62.56%, and the second PCA 2 axes 37.44%. The GGE bi-plot anal ysis indicated that the total variation PC (principle component) was 83.09%, and PC1 was accounted as 63.69%, PC2 only 19.40%. The AMMI analysis showed that C11 was quite stable as well as the highest yielder among test genotypes, while C7 and C8 were unstable and low yielding across environ ments. The GGE biplot indicated that it was detect ed in two mega-environments, and the first mega environment covered three environment (E1, E2 and E3), and the second mega-environment covered only E4. The genotypes C11 and C12 remained superior under ME I, while genotypes C1, C3 and C5 were for ME II. Among the genotypes, the gen otype C1 may be recommended to be developed and released as an approved cultivar for being com paratively more stable and the highest yielder. Therefore the AMMI and GGE biplot models have an opportunity to determine the best genotypes under multiple environments considering on adapt ability and stability concentrating on overall per formance for screening superior genotypes.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage6872en_US
dc.identifier.issue9en_US
dc.identifier.startpage6865en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/5805
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000485852800061en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.institutionauthorKızılgeçi, Ferhat
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFresenius Environmental Bulletinen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası - Editör Denetimli Dergien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectYield, interaction, superiority, environment.en_US
dc.titleSTABILITY EVALUATION OF BREAD WHEAT GENOTYPES UNDER VARYING ENVIRONMENTS BY AMMI MODELen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
61FEB_19_00791cr.pdf
Boyut:
496.19 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Bitkisel ve Hayvansal Üretim Bölümü Koleksiyonu