Effects of ecological factors on spring Barley genotypes

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-8812-8847en_US
dc.contributor.authorKendal, Enver
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-13T07:10:26Z
dc.date.available2021-07-13T07:10:26Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.departmentMAÜ, Meslek Yüksekokulları, Kızıltepe Meslek Yüksekokulu, Bitkisel ve Hayvansal Üretim Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractLate spring frosts and drought are the most important abiotic stress factors that definite the yield and quality performance of spring barley genotypes in breeding programs. For this purpose, a total of 25 spring barley genotypes were used in the study, including 20 advanced line and 5 standard varieties. The 2013/14 growing season, in which the late spring frosts were effective, and the 2012/13 growing season were compared with the biplot technique in terms of yield, quality and other features. Depending on the late spring frosts, significant differences were determined between the genotypes in terms of grain yield, quality parameters and other characteristics between the two growing seasons. Late spring frosts caused a significant reducing in grain yield (GY) by 26.2%, hectoliter weight (HW) by 6.3%, and in thousand grain weight (TGW) by 18.6%, while increasing protein content (PC) by 18.3%. It has been determined that the early spiked spring barley genotypes are more affected than the late spiked genotypes from late spring frosts, in terms of GY, TW, TGW and PC. The GGE biplot analysis showed that four distinct groups of traits were occured in the 2012/2013 and five in 2013/2014 growing seasons, respectively. The result of GGE biplot indicated that G14, G19, G21 and Samyeli variety were stable and ideal genotypes for all of the traits in the 2012/2013 season, and G3, G4, G7 and G8 were stable and ideal for the 2013/2014 season. On the other hand; G3 was the best genotype against late spring frost based on GY. In addition, results from the AMMI (Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction) analysis revealed that genotypes G7, G8, and G22 were more stable and higher yielding, compared to the other genotypes.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKendal, E. 2021 Effects of ecological factors on spring Barley genotypes. Hordeum vulgare, Pages 87 - 114en_US
dc.identifier.issue87en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85108925830en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage114en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85108925830&origin=SingleRecordEmailAlert&dgcid=raven_sc_affil_en_us_email&txGid=da00b98523d6792ad0ac4045aae1c25d
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/2654
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHordeum vulgareen_US
dc.relation.ispartofHordeum vulgareen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKitap Bölümü - Uluslararasıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAMMI; Biplot; Quality; Stress; Yielden_US
dc.titleEffects of ecological factors on spring Barley genotypesen_US
dc.typeBook Chapteren_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Chapterpdf.pdf
Boyut:
2.52 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Full text - Article
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Bitkisel ve Hayvansal Üretim Bölümü Koleksiyonu