EVOLOTION BARLEY GENOTYPES IN MULTI-ENVIRONMENT TRIALS BY AMMI MODEL AND GGE BIPLOT ANALYSIS

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-3557-3840en_US
dc.contributor.authorOral, Erol
dc.contributor.authorKendal, Enver
dc.contributor.authorKılıç, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorDoğan, Yusuf
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-31T11:40:11Z
dc.date.available2019-07-31T11:40:11Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.departmentMAÜ, Meslek Yüksekokulları, Kızıltepe Meslek Yüksekokulu, Bitkisel ve Hayvansal Üretim Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractBreeding program decisions to improve new varieties. The AMMI (Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) analysis and Genotype x Environment Interaction (GEI) is make to estimation grain yield and understands GxE interaction patterns by researches as differential ranking of variety yields in multi environment trials. Therefore, fifteen barley advanced line and six national cultivars and four foreign varieties (registered in abroad) were used in the study. The experimentswere performed according to a complete randomized block design with four replications at five environments during two years. The stability and superiority of genotypes for yield and other traits were determined using AMMI and GGE biplotanalysis. Factors (G, GE, and GEI) were found to be highly significant (P < 0.01) for grain yield. AMMI analysis indicated that the major contributionsto treatment sum of squares were environments (98.52%), GE (0.45%) and genotypes (1.02%), respectively, suggesting that grain yield of genotypes were effected environmental conditions.The GGE biplot indicated that PCA 1 axes (Principal component) was significant as P<0.01 and supplied to 49.36% of complete GxE interaction. The AMMI indicated that G8 and G23 desirable and stabile genotypes for grain yield in multienvironment. Moreover, E2 and E5 (irrigated environments) were high yielding, while E3 (drought stress) low yielding as forecast. On the other hand, GGE biplot indicated that three group were occurred among traits, first group (GY: grain yield, CC: crude cellulose, CD: cold damage), second group (PC: , HW: hectoliter weight, TGW: thousand grain weight, SH: seed humidity), third group (LOD: lodging, PH: plant height, HT: heading time). Moreover: the study showed that G3, G6, G7, G8, G13 and G21 were the best genotypes both grain yield and other traits. The results of AMMI model and GGE biplot indicated that G8 is suitable to recommend for release and G23 desirable origin for yield stability and G7 valuable source for quality to use in barley breeding program.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage3196en_US
dc.identifier.issue4Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage3186en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/1851
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofFresenius Environmental Bulletinen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBarley, GEI, AMMI, GGE biplot, Grain yield, Stabilityen_US
dc.titleEVOLOTION BARLEY GENOTYPES IN MULTI-ENVIRONMENT TRIALS BY AMMI MODEL AND GGE BIPLOT ANALYSISen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
fresenius.pdf
Boyut:
857.99 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Bitkisel ve Hayvansal Üretim Bölümü Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu