What are the mistakes we think are correct about the Natural resource curse' hypothesis? New insights from quantile regressions via method of moments for EU

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSavranlar, Buket
dc.contributor.authorAtay Polat, Melike
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Alper
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-24T10:58:35Z
dc.date.available2023-10-24T10:58:35Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentMAÜ, Fakülteler, İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, İktisat Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractThe nexus among natural resources and economic growth has recently been extensively studied in the context of the "Natural Resource Curse (NRC)" hypothesis. It is critical to use the latest analysis techniques in the development of the relevant literature. Therefore, this study aims to test the NRC hypothesis in EU member countries applying the Method of Moments Quantile Regression. Moreover, the focus of this study on EU countries for the first time fills an important gap in the literature. Renewable energy consumption, gross fixed capital formation, and urbanization are adopted as control variables. The findings demonstrate the validity of the NRC hypothesis at all quantile levels. Renewable energy consumption contributes to economic growth up to 0.70 quantile level. Additionally, gross fixed capital formation and urbanization have a positive impact on growth at all quantile levels. Empirical outputs highlight the importance of natural resources for growth in EU member countries and raise suggestions for possible policy formulation and implementation processes.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSavranlar, B., Atay Polat, M., & Aslan, A. (2023). What are the mistakes we think are correct about the ‘natural resource curse’ hypothesis? new insights from quantile regressions via method of moments for eu. Resources Policy, 85, 103947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103947en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103947en_US
dc.identifier.issuePart Aen_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85165328680en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103947
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12514/4290
dc.identifier.volume85en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001070537400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorAtay Polat, Melike
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofResources Policyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectResources rentsen_US
dc.subjectEnergyen_US
dc.subjectGrowthen_US
dc.subjectMethod of moments quantile regressionen_US
dc.titleWhat are the mistakes we think are correct about the Natural resource curse' hypothesis? New insights from quantile regressions via method of moments for EUen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
Ä°sim:
atay.pdf
Boyut:
632.62 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Article/Makale
Ä°ndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
Ä°sim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
Ä°ndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
İktisat Bölümü Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu